Publisher headlines and profiles remain in their original language. Choosing an edition does not translate them.

Society updated October 30, 2026 at 21:50

Kur qeveria bën humor me Kushtetutën • Shteg Investigativ

What happened

Compiled from the sources

Dy akte normative, protesta, xhama të thyer dhe një ligj që nuk ekziston

In the story's original language

An excerpt from Shteg Investigativ

Credits: Foto e gjeneruar nga AI - Aktet normative të qeverisëKur qeveria, në një akt normativ, citon një ligj që nuk ekziston, ndoshta ka ardhur koha ta trajtojmë Kushtetutën me pak humor. Sepse ata që hartuan këto akte, duket se e kanë marrë atë si shaka. Kur Kushtetuta e një vendi shpërfillet kaq hapur, mund të vazhdojmë të rendisim shkeljet me solemnitetin e zakonshëm juridik, duke cituar nene, parime dhe vendime gjykatash. Por vjen një moment kur realiteti bëhet aq absurd, sa edhe analiza më serioze rrezikon të tingëllojë si satirë. Ndaj, kësaj radhe, po i marrim pak me humor dy aktet normative të qeverisë, të datës 28 tetor. Në fund të fundit, materialin na e kanë përgatitur vetë. Dy akte normative brenda një dite. Njëri për të kufizuar protestat dhe për të gjobitur protestuesit, tjetri për t’ua faturuar organizatorëve edhe xhamat që thyejnë të tjerët. Një produkt juridik që meriton vëmendje, jo vetëm për atë që parashikon, por edhe për mënyrën se si është hartuar. Në aktin e…

What is still uncertain

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

Mosaic is not sure that every article is about the same event; the grouping is waiting for a check.
So far only Shteg Investigativ reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.

How they headlined it

Reported by Shteg Investigativ. Each headline opens at its publisher, in a new tab.

Shteg Investigativ Albania · October 30, 2026 at 21:50 publisher's date

Kur qeveria bën humor me Kushtetutën • Shteg Investigativ

By Irena Dule

Earliest report found by Mosaic

Dy akte normative, protesta, xhama të thyer dhe një ligj që nuk ekziston

Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language

How we decide

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.

An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.

It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.

Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.

Explore coverage Read at Shteg Investigativ

Reader rating: not enough eligible votes yet.

A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading