Society updated
Kush i kompenson pasagjerët kur ka vonesa në fluturime
Reported by albinfo.ch How this story’s score was calculated
What happened
Compiled from the sources
TAP Air Portugal, LOT Polish Airlines dhe Wizz Air janë kompanitë ajrore më korrekte në Europë në trajtimin e kërkesave për kompensim, sipas një renditjeje të AirAdvisor, që ka analizuar 22 operatorë
In the story's original language
An excerpt from albinfo.ch
Vonesat e fluturimeve janë të pakëndshme, por kompensimet e garantuara nga legjislacioni i BE-së ua lehtësojnë disi pasojat pasagjerëve. Sipas Rregullores (KE) nr. 261/2004, kompensimi është 250 euro për fluturimet nën 1,500 kilometra me vonesë mbi dy orë, 400 euro për distancat 1,500–3,500 kilometra me vonesë mbi tri orë dhe 600 euro për fluturimet e tjera me vonesë mbi katër orë. Në praktikë, marrja e parave nuk është gjithmonë e shpejtë ose e lehtë. Pasagjerët mund ta paraqesin vetë kërkesën ose t’u drejtohen kompanive të specializuara, si AirAdvisor. Nga janari në qershor 2026, AirAdvisor ndihmoi në paraqitjen e 68,283 kërkesave ndaj 59 kompanive ajrore. Renditja u hartua sipas përqindjes së kërkesave të zgjidhura dhe rasteve që përfunduan në gjykatë, pasi u refuzuan ose mbetën pa përgjigje, shkruan Euronews, transmeton albinfo.ch. Kompanitë më të mira TAP Air Portugal renditet e para, me 88.7% të kërkesave të zgjidhura, vetëm 0.6% të referuara në gjykatë dhe një pritje mesatare…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only albinfo.ch reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
albinfo.ch Switzerland · publisher's date
Kush i kompenson pasagjerët kur ka vonesa në fluturime
By Br
Earliest report found by Mosaic
TAP Air Portugal, LOT Polish Airlines dhe Wizz Air janë kompanitë ajrore më korrekte në Europë në trajtimin e kërkesave për kompensim, sipas një renditjeje të AirAdvisor, që ka analizuar 22 operatorë
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.