Society updated
KLSH: 12.3 miliardë lekë efekte financiare negative në buxhetin 2025
Reported by Ekofin 137 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
KLSH ka gjetur 12.33 miliardë lekë efekte financiare negative dhe 171.9 milionë lekë dëm ekonomik nga auditimet
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Ekofin
Kontrolli i Lartë i Shtetit ka evidentuar 12.33 miliardë lekë efekte financiare negative dhe 171.9 milionë lekë dëm ekonomik nga auditimet për zbatimin e buxhetit të shtetit për vitin 2025. Raporti nxjerr në pah probleme në mbledhjen e të ardhurave, përdorimin e fondeve publike, investimet, koncesionet dhe raportimin e shpenzimeve, duke ngritur pikëpyetje mbi efektivitetin e administrimit të financave publike. Sipas raportit të KLSH-së, nga 12.33 miliardë lekë efekte financiare negative, rreth 10.31 miliardë lekë lidhen me administrimin e të ardhurave, ndërsa 2.02 miliardë lekë me shpenzimet. Veçmas, dëmi ekonomik i evidentuar arrin në 171.9 milionë lekë, nga të cilat 163.6 milionë lekë lidhen me shpenzimet dhe 8.3 milionë lekë me të ardhurat. Këto janë dy kategori të ndryshme të gjetjeve të auditimit dhe nuk përfaqësojnë të gjitha humbje monetare të realizuara në të njëjtën mënyrë. Për shkak të parregullsive të konstatuara, KLSH ka dhënë një konkluzion të kualifikuar për…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- Mosaic is not sure that every article is about the same event; the grouping is waiting for a check.
- So far only Ekofin reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Ekofin Albania · publisher's date
KLSH: 12.3 miliardë lekë efekte financiare negative në buxhetin 2025
Earliest report found by Mosaic
KLSH ka gjetur 12.33 miliardë lekë efekte financiare negative dhe 171.9 milionë lekë dëm ekonomik nga auditimet
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.