Society updated
Gjykata rrëzon padinë 10 miliardë dollarëshe të Trump ndaj WSJ
Reported by NTV 155 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Një gjykatë federale në Shtetet e Bashkuara ka rrëzuar padinë prej 10 miliardë dollarësh të presidentit Donald Trump kundër gazetës “The Wall Street
In the story's original language
An excerpt from NTV
Bota Gjykata rrëzon padinë 10 miliardë dollarëshe të Trump ndaj WSJ Redaksia NTV • Një gjykatë federale në Shtetet e Bashkuara ka rrëzuar padinë prej 10 miliardë dollarësh të presidentit Donald Trump kundër gazetës “The Wall Street Journal”, lidhur me një artikull që pretendonte se ai kishte shkruar një letër me përmbajtje sugjestive për financierin e dënuar për krime seksuale, Jeffrey Epstein. BBC shkruan se, gjykatësi Darrin Gayles vendosi të rrëzojë çështjen, duke argumentuar se pretendimet e presidentit amerikan nuk mbështeteshin në prova të mjaftueshme dhe se padia binte ndesh me parimet e Amendamentit të Parë të Kushtetutës amerikane, i cili garanton lirinë e shtypit dhe të shprehjes. Trump kishte paditur kompaninë mëmë të gazetës, Dow Jones, si dhe drejtuesin e saj, Rupert Murdoch, pasi gazeta publikoi një artikull mbi një letër që pretendohej se presidenti amerikan ia kishte shkruar Epstein në vitin 2003, me rastin e 50-vjetorit të lindjes së këtij të fundit. Trump ka mohuar…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- Mosaic is not sure that every article is about the same event; the grouping is waiting for a check.
- So far only NTV reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
NTV Albania · publisher's date
Gjykata rrëzon padinë 10 miliardë dollarëshe të Trump ndaj WSJ
By Redaksia NTV
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Një gjykatë federale në Shtetet e Bashkuara ka rrëzuar padinë prej 10 miliardë dollarësh të presidentit Donald Trump kundër gazetës “The Wall Street
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.