Society updated
‘Dronë për gaz ndaj protestuesve, por jo për zjarret, ligje të rrepta për protestat, por jo për korrupsionin’
Reported by Gazeta Bulevard How this story’s score was calculated
What happened
Compiled from the sources
lutfi dervishi, dron per gaz,
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Gazeta Bulevard
Analisti Lutfi Dervishi ka bërë një reagim të fortë, ku përmes pesë pyetjeve vë përballë mënyrën se si qeveria menaxhon protestat dhe mungesën e reagimit për problemet që shqetësojnë qytetarët. Në postimin e tij në Facebook, duke ironizuar investimet dhe mobilizimin e shpejtë të policisë për të përballuar protestuesit, Dervishi ngre pikëpyetje për mungesën e mjeteve për shuarjen e zjarreve, luftën kundër korrupsionit dhe rezultatet në procesin e integrimit europian. Postimi i plotë: PESË PYETJE Dronë për të hedhur gaz mbi protestuesit, po ku janë dronët për të shuar pyjet që digjen? Ujëhedhëse të reja që mbërrijnë me avion ushtarak brenda ditës, po ku janë zjarrfikëset kur flakët kapërcejnë shtëpitë? 2.500 euro shpërblim për policët që mbajnë rendin, po sa shpërblehen…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only Gazeta Bulevard reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Gazeta Bulevard Albania · publisher's date
‘Dronë për gaz ndaj protestuesve, por jo për zjarret, ligje të rrepta për protestat, por jo për korrupsionin’
By Bulevard News
Earliest report found by Mosaic
lutfi dervishi, dron per gaz,
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.