Society updated
U kap me telefon në timon, e pëson ish-ministri britanik: Po shikoja hartat
What happened
Compiled from the sources
U kap me telefon në timon, e pëson ish-ministri britanik: Po shikoja hartat
In the story's original language
An excerpt from BalkanWeb
Deputeti britanik dhe ish-ministri George Freeman është gjobitur me 430 paund dhe është ndëshkuar me gjashtë pikë penalizimi në patentën e drejtimit, pasi u kap duke përdorur telefonin celular gjatë drejtimit të automjetit. Ngjarja u denoncua nga një çiklist, i cili e kishte parë Freeman duke parë telefonin ndërsa ishte në timon dhe njoftoi policinë. Deputeti, i cili përfaqëson zonën zgjedhore Mid Norfolk që prej vitit 2010, u deklarua fajtor më 1 shtator në Gjykatën e Magjistraturës në Stratford. Freeman pranoi se kishte përdorur aplikacionin e navigimit Waze, duke pretenduar se ishte bllokuar në trafik dhe po kontrollonte hartat në telefonin e tij. “Isha i bllokuar në trafik dhe po kontrolloja Waze në telefonin tim. Marr përgjegjësi të plotë dhe pendohem thellësisht për veprimet e mia”, deklaroi ai për gazetën Mirror. Përveç gjobës prej 430 paundësh, gjykata i vendosi edhe 172 paund shpenzime gjyqësore dhe 130 paund për shpenzimet e policisë së Londrës. George Freeman ka mbajtur…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only BalkanWeb reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
BalkanWeb Albania · when Mosaic first saw it
U kap me telefon në timon, e pëson ish-ministri britanik: Po shikoja hartat
Earliest report found by Mosaic
U kap me telefon në timon, e pëson ish-ministri britanik: Po shikoja hartat
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.