Society updated November 3, 2026 at 09:37

Ndodh dhe kjo! Vodhi orën luksoze 260 mijë euro në Tokio, por e ktheu me postë bashkë me një letër faljeje

Reported by BalkanWeb How this story’s score was calculated

What happened

Compiled from the sources

In the story's original language

An excerpt from BalkanWeb

Një ngjarje e pazakontë ka ndodhur në Tokio të Japonisë, ku një orë luksoze zvicerane, me vlerë mbi 260 mijë euro, e vjedhur nga një dyqan javën e kaluar, është kthyer në mënyrë misterioze së bashku me një letër kërkimfaljeje. Vjedhja ndodhi në lagjen Nakano, ku një burrë u paraqit në dyqan si klient dhe kërkoi të provonte një orë të markës Audemars Piguet, me vlerë 46 milionë jen. Pasi e vendosi në kyçin e dorës, ai u largua nga dyqani pa e kthyer atë. Por ngjarja mori një kthesë të papritur më 1 nëntor, kur dyqani mori një pako që përmbante pikërisht orën e vjedhur, së bashku me një letër të shkruar me dorë, ku kërkohej falje për veprimin. Sipas mediave japoneze, numri serial i orës konfirmoi se bëhej fjalë për të njëjtin aksesor të raportuar të vjedhur. Megjithatë, identiteti i personit që e ktheu atë mbetet i panjohur. Policia e Tokios vijon kërkimet për të dyshuarin, ndërsa dyqani nuk ka pranuar të komentojë ngjarjen. Ky nuk është…

What is still uncertain

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

So far only BalkanWeb reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.

How they headlined it

Reported by BalkanWeb. Each headline opens at its publisher, in a new tab.

BalkanWeb Albania · November 3, 2026 at 09:37 when Mosaic first saw it

Ndodh dhe kjo! Vodhi orën luksoze 260 mijë euro në Tokio, por e ktheu me postë bashkë me një letër faljeje

Earliest report found by Mosaic

Ndodh dhe kjo! Vodhi orën luksoze 260 mijë euro në Tokio, por e ktheu me postë bashkë me një letër faljeje

Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language

How we decide

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.

An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.

It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.

A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.

Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.

Explore coverage Read at BalkanWeb

Reader rating: not enough eligible votes yet.

A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading