Sport updated
“Shpresoja të largohej falas”, ish-ylli i Real Madridit me kritika të ashpra ndaj Viniciusit
Reported by Reporteri.net 293 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Ish-portieri i Real Madridit, Santi Canizares, ka kritikuar ashpër Vinicius Juniorin, duke deklaruar se sjellja e brazilianit po i shkakton probleme klubit
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Reporteri.net
Ish-portieri i Real Madridit, Santi Canizares, ka kritikuar ashpër Vinicius Juniorin, duke deklaruar se sjellja e brazilianit po i shkakton probleme klubit madrilen dhe po dëmton imazhin e tij. Canizares beson se Vinicius ka krijuar vazhdimisht situata të pakëndshme për “Los Blancos”, ndërsa kundërshtimi i tij ndaj rinovimit të kontratës së sulmuesit nuk ka ndryshuar, pavarësisht vendimit të klubit për ta mbajtur atë. Ish-portieri spanjoll kishte qenë kundër rinovimit të kontratës së brazilianit që verën e kaluar, duke argumentuar se lojtari e kishte shteruar vlerën e tij te klubi. Lexo edhe Zhegrova mund të përfitojë nga lëndimi i Locatellit, Juventusi shqyrton përfshirjen e tij në Ligën e Evropës 2 min lexim Moti i keq pritet të ndikojë në ndeshjen Barcelona – Aston Villa në “Camp Nou” 2 min lexim Sa fitoi Antonelli duke fituar titullin e Formula 1? 2 min lexim “Ndoshta jam i vetmi që mendon kështu, por e konsideroj këtë vendim një gabim. Për mua, rinovimi i kontratës së Viniciusit…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only Reporteri.net reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Reporteri.net Kosovo · publisher's date
“Shpresoja të largohej falas”, ish-ylli i Real Madridit me kritika të ashpra ndaj Viniciusit
By Zana Pllana
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Ish-portieri i Real Madridit, Santi Canizares, ka kritikuar ashpër Vinicius Juniorin, duke deklaruar se sjellja e brazilianit po i shkakton probleme klubit
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.