Society updated
Dy shtetas kosovarë dënohen për vjedhje në fabrikën e brisqeve zvicerane Victorinox
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Të gjitha mallrat e vjedhura midis viteve 2018 dhe 2023 bëjnë të paktën 208,000 franga zvicerane
In the story's original language
An excerpt from albinfo.ch
Tre ish-punonjës të fabrikës Victorinox, të njohur për prodhimin e thikave tradicionale “ushtrake” të Zvicrës vodhën thika, orë dore, çanta shpine dhe produkte të tjera. Të gjitha së bashku me vlerë të paktën 208,000 franga zvicerane midis viteve 2018 dhe 2023, transmeton albinfo.ch. Gjykata Kantonale e Schwyz i dënoi ata për vepra të ndryshme penale. Kryetari i bandës, një 42-vjeçar kosovar, mori një dënim me burgim pjesërisht me kusht prej 36 muajsh, shkruan Luzernerzeitung.ch. Ai duhet të vuajë gjashtë muaj burg efektiv. Atij ju shqiptua gjithashtu vendimi për dëbim nga Zvicra për shtatë vjet. Një burrë 45-vjeçar shtetas gjerman, i dënuar si bashkëpunëtor, mori një dënim me kusht prej 18 muajsh dhe një urdhër deportimi pesëvjeçar. I dënuari i tretë, një burrë 50-vjeçar kosovar mori një gjobë me kusht prej 180 frangash zvicerane ditore për vjedhje të thjeshtë dhe hyrje pa leje, përcjell albinfo.ch. Ai nuk u urdhërua të largohej nga vendi. Autorët duhet të paguajnë një pjesë…
How they headlined it
- Switzerland (1)
- Kosovo (1)
-
albinfo.ch Switzerland · publisher's date
Dy shtetas kosovarë dënohen për vjedhje në fabrikën e brisqeve zvicerane Victorinox
By Albinfo.ch
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Të gjitha mallrat e vjedhura midis viteve 2018 dhe 2023 bëjnë të paktën 208,000 franga zvicerane
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
-
Reporteri.net Kosovo · publisher's date
Dy shtetas kosovarë dënohen për vjedhje në fabrikën e brisqeve zvicerane Victorinox
By Lira Klaiqi
Të gjitha mallrat e vjedhura midis viteve 2018 dhe 2023 bëjnë të paktën 208,000 franga zvicerane.
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
The number says how many outlets cover it, not how many independent investigations there are. An article that repeats another outlet's text may come from a news agency or a press release. How we decide
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.