Society updated
Protestat s’e rrëzojnë Ramën, nëse qytetaria vazhdon të qëndrojë spektatore
Reported by Argumentum 229 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Prof. Dr. Fadil Maloku, sociolog Protestat në Tiranë ndaj tiranisë së autokratit Edi Rama janë duke vazhduar edhe më tej,
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Argumentum
Prof. Dr. Fadil Maloku, sociolog Protestat në Tiranë ndaj tiranisë së autokratit Edi Rama janë duke vazhduar edhe më tej, ndërkaq, dorëheqja e kërkuar ende nuk është askund në horizont! Në ndërkohë, as strukturat apo “staturat”organizative të protestave nuk kanë dalë ende publikisht me një platformë të qartë se si duhet vazhduar më tej ky demonstrim ende civilizues. Në gjykimin tim, duke marrë parasysh përvojat, strategjitë, por edhe metodologjitë adekuate për status quo-në e tanishme, “task-forca” e tyre, pa asnjë vonesë të mëtejme, do të duhej të ulej me urgjencë dhe ta rishqyrtonte, jo shkarazi, por siç thuhet, me “koka të ftohura”, se përse insistimi për dorëheqje ende nuk është realizuar?! Në këtë lloj “sofre” apo Kuvendi të improvizuar, këto “statura” do të duhej gjithashtu, përveç të tjerash, të elaboronin si të metat, ashtu edhe përparësitë e strategjisë së deritanishme, në mënyrë që të “skanonin” në mënyrë meritore si dobësitë e ngecjes, ashtu edhe momentet e avancimit të…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- Mosaic is not sure that every article is about the same event; the grouping is waiting for a check.
- So far only Argumentum reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Argumentum Albania · when Mosaic first saw it
Protestat s’e rrëzojnë Ramën, nëse qytetaria vazhdon të qëndrojë spektatore
By Marjana Doda
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Prof. Dr. Fadil Maloku, sociolog Protestat në Tiranë ndaj tiranisë së autokratit Edi Rama janë duke vazhduar edhe më tej,
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
Publisher's date:
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.