Society updated
Senatori republikan i Alaskës, Dan Sullivan, u bën thirrje njerëzve të votojnë për “Dan Sullivanin e duhur”
Reported by Euronews Albania 169 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Senatori republikan në detyrë, Dan Sullivan, ka akuzuar kandidaten demokrate për Senatin, Mary Peltola, dhe udhëheqësin e pakicës në Senat, Chuck Schumer,
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Euronews Albania
Bota | Lajmi i fundit Senatori republikan i Alaskës, Dan Sullivan, u bën thirrje njerëzve të votojnë për “Dan Sullivanin e duhur” 3 Nëntor 2026 | 23:24 Senatori republikan në detyrë, Dan Sullivan, ka akuzuar kandidaten demokrate për Senatin, Mary Peltola, dhe udhëheqësin e pakicës në Senat, Chuck Schumer, se kanë krijuar një skemë që, sipas tij, mund të çojë në ngatërrimin e votuesve në Alaskë. Sullivan pretendon se mijëra banorë të Alaskës mund të hedhin poshtë votën e tyre për shkak të pranisë në fletën e votimit të një kandidati tjetër me të njëjtin emër, Dan Sullivan, një mësues në pension. Duke folur me gazetarët në Anchorage, pasi votoi në Kopshtin Zoologjik të Alaskës, senatori e cilësoi këtë situatë si “skandalin më të madh zgjedhor dhe skandalin më të madh të mashtrimit në historinë e Alaskës”. Megjithatë, Sullivan deklaroi se do ta pranonte rezultatin e zgjedhjeve edhe në rast humbjeje, pasi të numëroheshin dhe certifikoheshin të gjitha votat e ligjshme. Ndërkohë…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only Euronews Albania reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Euronews Albania Albania · publisher's date
Senatori republikan i Alaskës, Dan Sullivan, u bën thirrje njerëzve të votojnë për “Dan Sullivanin e duhur”
By Besnik
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Senatori republikan në detyrë, Dan Sullivan, ka akuzuar kandidaten demokrate për Senatin, Mary Peltola, dhe udhëheqësin e pakicës në Senat, Chuck Schumer,
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.