Society updated
Raporti i BE-së: Kosova s’ka shënuar progres në fushën e kontrollit financiar, rekomandimet e vitit të kaluar s’u adresuan
Reported by Raporto24 291 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Raporti i këtij viti thekson se rekomandimet nga viti i kaluar të Komisionit Europian nuk janë adresuar në vitin 2026. “Rekomandimet e Komisionit nga viti i kaluar nuk janë adresuar…
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Raporto24
Kosova nuk ka shënuar ndonjë progres në fushën e kontrollit financiar, thotë raporti i Bashkimit Europian për vendin. Raporti i këtij viti thekson se rekomandimet nga viti i kaluar të Komisionit Europian nuk janë adresuar në vitin 2026. “Rekomandimet e Komisionit nga viti i kaluar nuk janë adresuar dhe mbeten të vlefshme”, thuhet në raport. Gjatë vitit të ardhshëm, raporti thotë se Kosova duhet veçanërisht të: – miratojë legjislacion të ri për menaxhimin e financave publike, duke forcuar kontrollin e brendshëm financiar publik, për auditimin e jashtëm dhe për mbrojtjen e interesave financiare të BE-së dhe euros, si dhe të sigurojë kapacitete administrative në të gjithë sistemin e menaxhimit të financave publike për zbatimin e tij; – forcojë llogaridhënien menaxheriale të përdoruesve të buxhetit, si në nivelin qendror ashtu…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- Mosaic is not sure that every article is about the same event; the grouping is waiting for a check.
- So far only Raporto24 reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Raporto24 Kosovo · publisher's date
Raporti i BE-së: Kosova s’ka shënuar progres në fushën e kontrollit financiar, rekomandimet e vitit të kaluar s’u adresuan
By Leni
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Raporti i këtij viti thekson se rekomandimet nga viti i kaluar të Komisionit Europian nuk janë adresuar në vitin 2026. “Rekomandimet e Komisionit nga viti i kaluar nuk janë adresuar…
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.