Society updated
36 vite pas diktaturës komuniste, Hungaria hap “dosjet e agjentëve”, DW: Lustracion i vonuar
What happened
Compiled from the sources
36 vite pas diktaturës komuniste, Hungaria hap “dosjet e agjentëve”, DW: Lustracion i vonuar
In the story's original language
An excerpt from BalkanWeb
36 vjet pas diktaturës komuniste, qeveria e Peter Magyarit hap “dosjet e agjentëve”. Por jo çdo emër në to dëshmon se personi ka vepruar si informator. Hungaria përballet me debatin mbi fajin dhe përgjegjësinë. 4 nëntori është një datë e dhimbshme për Hungarinë. Në këtë datë të vitit 1956, dhjetëra mijëra ushtarë sovjetikë, të mbështetur nga mijëra tanke, hynë në vend dhe shtypën me gjak revolucionin antikomunist. Më pas pasuan dekada diktature. Regjimi njihej me emërtimin ironik “komunizmi i gulashit”, por pushtetin e siguronte me metoda brutale, edhe me ndihmën e Sigurimit të Shtetit hungarez. Në mënyrë simbolike, pikërisht më 4 nëntor të këtij viti nis tani një përballje e vonuar me një nga pjesët më delikate të kësaj të kaluare: qeveria e Peter Magyarit hap të ashtuquajturat “dosje të agjentëve”, regjistra me emrat e “personave të rrjetit”, pra të njerëzve që Sigurimi i Shtetit hungarez gjatë sundimit komunist i kishte të regjistruar si informatorë. Shumica e tyre ishin në dijeni…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only BalkanWeb reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
BalkanWeb Albania · when Mosaic first saw it
36 vite pas diktaturës komuniste, Hungaria hap “dosjet e agjentëve”, DW: Lustracion i vonuar
Earliest report found by Mosaic
36 vite pas diktaturës komuniste, Hungaria hap “dosjet e agjentëve”, DW: Lustracion i vonuar
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.