Society updated
Cassis për vendimin ndaj ish-krerëve të UÇK-së: Nuk është vendim politik, Zvicra i pranon vendimet e gjykatave
Reported by albinfo.ch 305 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Shefi i diplomacisë zvicerane ka theksuar se Zvicra mbështet drejtësinë ndërkombëtare dhe respekton vendimet e gjykatave, duke mos komentuar përmbajtjen e tyre.
In the story's original language
An excerpt from albinfo.ch
Ministri i Punëve të Jashtme i Zvicrës, Ignazio Cassis, ka komentuar vendimin gjyqësor ndaj ish-krerëve të Ushtrisë Çlirimtare të Kosovës (UÇK), duke theksuar se ai duhet kuptuar si vendim gjykate dhe jo si vendim politik, transmeton albinfo.ch. Gjatë konferencës së përbashkët për media me zëvendëskryeministrin e parë dhe ministrin e Punëve të Jashtme dhe Diasporës, Glauk Konjufca, Cassis është pyetur për vendimin që lidhet me Hashim Thaçin, Kadri Veselin, Jakup Krasniqin dhe Rexhep Selimin. Në përgjigjen e tij, kryediplomati zviceran ka theksuar se vendi i tij mbështet gjykatat ndërkombëtare dhe pranon vendimet e tyre, duke vlerësuar se nuk i takon të komentojë përmbajtjen e vendimeve gjyqësore. “Zvicra i mbështet gjykatat ndërkombëtare dhe Zvicra i pranon vendimet e gjykatave ndërkombëtare dhe nuk i komenton këto vendime. Sepse është vendim i gjykatës dhe nuk është vendim politik, prandaj Zvicra i pranon këto vendime”, ka deklaruar Cassis. Deklarata e tij vjen në një kohë kur…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only albinfo.ch reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
albinfo.ch Switzerland · publisher's date
Cassis për vendimin ndaj ish-krerëve të UÇK-së: Nuk është vendim politik, Zvicra i pranon vendimet e gjykatave
By Drin Reçica
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Shefi i diplomacisë zvicerane ka theksuar se Zvicra mbështet drejtësinë ndërkombëtare dhe respekton vendimet e gjykatave, duke mos komentuar përmbajtjen e tyre.
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
Topics
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.