Society updated November 6, 2026 at 14:55

Buxheti 2027, ministria e Mbrojtjes rrit fondet, lë jashtë kompaninë “KAYO”

By Erion Abule

Reported by Faktoje.al 285 points Why this story ranks here

What happened

Compiled from the sources

In the story's original language

An excerpt from Faktoje.al

Ministri i Mbrojtjes, Ermal Nufi, prezantoi në Kuvend projektbuxhetin e Mbrojtjes për vitin 2027, duke u përballur me një sërë pyetjesh dhe akuzash nga deputetët e opozitës, veçanërisht për çështjen e kompanisë ushtarake shtetërore “KAYO”. Gjatë diskutimeve, opozita kërkoi sqarime mbi fondet publike të dhëna për “KAYO”-n, duke deklaruar se Prokuroria e Posaçme po heton dyshimet për shkelje në tendera dhe abuzim me paratë publike. Deputeti i partisë “Mundësia”, Erald Kapri ngriti gjithashtu pikëpyetje mbi aktivitetin real të kompanisë, prodhimin e armëve dhe akuzat për trafik armësh. Në përgjigjen e tij, Nufi deklaroi se “KAYO” ka pasur të miratuar vetëm 3 milionë euro kapital themeltar për vitin 2026 dhe se nuk ka përfituar fonde të tjera nga buxheti i shtetit për bashkëpunimet tregtare. “Unë them atë që kam me letra në Thesarin e Shtetit, ka vetëm 3 milionë euro kapital themeltar”, tha ai. Ministri theksoi se për vitin 2027 nuk është parashikuar asnjë zë financiar për kompaninë…

What is still uncertain

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

So far only Faktoje.al reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.

How they headlined it

Reported by Faktoje.al. Each headline opens at its publisher, in a new tab.

Faktoje.al Albania · November 6, 2026 at 14:54 publisher's date

Buxheti 2027, ministria e Mbrojtjes rrit fondet, lë jashtë kompaninë “KAYO”

By Erion Abule

Earliest report found by Mosaic

Ministri i Mbrojtjes, Ermal Nufi, prezantoi në Kuvend projektbuxhetin e Mbrojtjes për vitin 2027, duke u përballur me një sërë pyetjesh dhe akuzash nga deputetët e opozitës, veçanërisht për çështjen e kompanisë ushtarake shtetërore “KAYO”.

Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language

How we decide

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.

An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.

It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.

A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.

Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.

Explore coverage Read at Faktoje.al

Reader rating: not enough eligible votes yet.

A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading