Society updated November 6, 2026 at 23:08

Gjykata Supreme Federale, e ndarë politikisht

By Albinfo.ch

Reported by albinfo.ch 278 points Why this story ranks here

What happened

Compiled from the sources

Gjyqtarët vazhdimisht zbulojnë sekrete për kundërshtarët e tyre në shtyp. Kjo ngre pyetje në lidhje me gjendjen e gjykatës më të lartë të Zvicrës

In the story's original language

An excerpt from albinfo.ch

Gjykata Supreme Federale duhet të rishqyrtojë një vendim lidhur me dy nga anëtarët e saj që kishin një lidhje romantike. Gjyqtari Federal Yves Donzallaz dhe Gjyqtarja Federale Beatrice van de Graaf ishin çift për një kohë. Gjykata vendosi që marrëdhënia e tyre përbënte një bashkëjetesë të palejueshme dhe afatgjatë. Qoftë edhe pamja e thjeshtë e një lidhjeje romantike do të konsiderohej e papajtueshme me pavarësinë gjyqësore, sipas vendimit. Prandaj, trupi gjykues në fjalë (ku merrnin pjesë të dy personat në lidhje dashurie) ishte formuar në mënyrë të papërshtatshme në procedura. Një burrë i dënuar kishte kërkuar një rishikim pasi kishte mësuar për lidhjen. Vendimi tregon përçarjet e thella brenda Gjykatës Supreme Federale, thotë korrespondentja e gjykatës për SRF, Sibilla Bondolfi. Tani është dukshëm e qartë se gjyqtarëve nuk u lejohet të kenë lidhje romantike, por konflikti është më i thellë. Gjykata është e ndarë politikisht. Prapa skenave…

What is still uncertain

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

So far only albinfo.ch reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.

How they headlined it

Reported by albinfo.ch. Each headline opens at its publisher, in a new tab.

albinfo.ch Switzerland · November 6, 2026 at 23:05 publisher's date

Gjykata Supreme Federale, e ndarë politikisht

By Albinfo.ch

Earliest report found by Mosaic

Gjyqtarët vazhdimisht zbulojnë sekrete për kundërshtarët e tyre në shtyp. Kjo ngre pyetje në lidhje me gjendjen e gjykatës më të lartë të Zvicrës

Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language

How we decide

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.

An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.

It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.

A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.

Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.

Explore coverage Read at albinfo.ch

Reader rating: not enough eligible votes yet.

A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading