Society updated
Skandali i mbetjeve të rrezikshme në Elbasan/ Prokuroria sekuestron mbi 300 tonë pluhur nga uzina e Albchrome
Reported by Gazeta Bulevard 119 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
elbasan, skandali, mbetjet e rrezikshme, 300 ton pluhur, prokuroria,
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Gazeta Bulevard
Prokuroria e Elbasanit ka sekuestruar mbi 300 tonë pluhur të përftuar nga aktiviteti i Uzinës së Ferrokromit, në pronësi të kompanisë koncesionare Albchrome. Bëhet fjalë për mbetje të kapura nga sistemi i pluhurkapëseve, të cilat, sipas një raporti të Agjencisë Kombëtare të Mjedisit (AKM), janë cilësuar si shumë të rrezikshme për shëndetin dhe mjedisin. Sipas dokumenteve zyrtare të Prokurorisë së Elbasanit, sasia prej mbi 300 tonësh është sekuestruar në cilësinë e provës materiale, pasi konsiderohet e domosdoshme për vërtetimin e fakteve që janë objekt i hetimit penal. Për shkak të natyrës dhe sasisë së madhe të materialit, prokurorët kanë vendosur që mbetjet të qëndrojnë në ruajtje pranë vetë subjektit Albchrome sh.p.k., i cili ka detyrimin t’i ruajë dhe t’i paraqesë ato sa herë të kërkohen nga organi procedues. Skandali me mbetjet e rrezikshme u zbulua më 28 maj, kur Inspektorati Kombëtar i Mbrojtjes së Territorit pezulloi aktivitetin e Albchrome, pasi evidentoi 318 tonë mbetje të…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only Gazeta Bulevard reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Gazeta Bulevard Albania · publisher's date
Skandali i mbetjeve të rrezikshme në Elbasan/ Prokuroria sekuestron mbi 300 tonë pluhur nga uzina e Albchrome
By Bulevard News
Earliest report found by Mosaic
elbasan, skandali, mbetjet e rrezikshme, 300 ton pluhur, prokuroria,
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.