Society updated
Rrjeti zviceran i supermarketeve minimizon zërat për humbje vendesh pune
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Një bashkim i planifikuar i kooperativave rajonale në zinxhirin e supermarketeve zvicerane “Migros” nuk do të çojë në humbjen e mijëra vendeve të punës, sipas kryetarit Mario Irminger. “Sigurisht që nuk…
In the story's original language
An excerpt from albinfo.ch
Një bashkim i planifikuar i kooperativave rajonale në zinxhirin e supermarketeve zvicerane “Migros” nuk do të çojë në humbjen e mijëra vendeve të punës, sipas kryetarit Mario Irminger. “Në media po qarkullojnë shifra të pasakta,” tha ai për gazetën *Neue Zürcher Zeitung* (NZZ). “Sigurisht që nuk bëhet fjalë për mijëra vende pune. Këto vlerësime ndoshta bazohen në një analizë të bashkimit me ‘Coop’-in, që ndodhi 25 vjet më parë, por situata në ‘Migros’ është ndryshe.” Gazeta SonntagsZeitung ka sugjeruar mundësinë e kursimeve vjetore midis 300 dhe 400 milionë frangave zvicerane, si pasojë e shkurtimit të 3 000 vendeve të punës. Bazuar në llogaritjet e veta, NZZ vlerëson se mund të shkurtohen nga 400 deri në 600 vende pune administrative, përcjell albinfo.ch. “Për momentin, nuk dëshiroj të komentoj një shifër të tillë,” tha Irminger. “Një gjë është e sigurt: në nivelin drejtues dhe administrativ, me kalimin e kohës do t’i heqim strukturat paralele. Në supermarketet ‘Migros’ kemi 55 000…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only albinfo.ch reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
albinfo.ch Switzerland · when Mosaic first saw it
Rrjeti zviceran i supermarketeve minimizon zërat për humbje vendesh pune
By Erezzaademi
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Një bashkim i planifikuar i kooperativave rajonale në zinxhirin e supermarketeve zvicerane “Migros” nuk do të çojë në humbjen e mijëra vendeve të punës, sipas kryetarit Mario Irminger. “Sigurisht që nuk…
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
Publisher's date:
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.