Society updated
10 vite koncesioni i Check-up, 902 milionë lekë pagesa për analiza të pakryera
Reported by Ekofin 238 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Kontrolli i Lartë i Shtetit (KLSH) ka gjetur 129.4 milionë lekë pagesa për shërbime të pakryera gjatë vitit 2025 në koncesionet e shëndetësisë
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Ekofin
Koncesioni i kontrollit mjekësor bazë, i njohur si Check-up, ka përfituar rreth 902 milionë lekë pagesa për 489,132 kontrolle të pakryera gjatë periudhës 2015–2025, ndërsa aplikimi i TVSH-së mbi shërbimin ka krijuar një tjetër kosto buxhetore prej 1.34 miliardë lekësh. Këto janë dy nga gjetjet kryesore të Kontrollit të Lartë të Shtetit, i cili ka evidentuar probleme të konsiderueshme në financimin, monitorimin dhe përmbushjen e detyrimeve të kontratës koncesionare. Sipas raportit të auditimit mbi zbatimin e buxhetit të shtetit për vitin 2025, pagesat totale ndaj koncesionarit deri më 31 dhjetor 2025 kanë arritur në 8.05 miliardë lekë me TVSH. Nga 4,366,140 kontrolle të financuara gjatë kësaj periudhe, janë realizuar 3,877,008, ndërsa 489,132 janë paguar pa u kryer. Kontrata parashikonte një volum prej 475 mijë kontrollesh në vit, nivel që sipas KLSH-së është arritur dhe tejkaluar vetëm në vitin 2019. Megjithatë, pagesat janë kryer duke u mbështetur te volumi minimal i garantuar…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- Mosaic is not sure that every article is about the same event; the grouping is waiting for a check.
- So far only Ekofin reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Ekofin Albania · publisher's date
10 vite koncesioni i Check-up, 902 milionë lekë pagesa për analiza të pakryera
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Kontrolli i Lartë i Shtetit (KLSH) ka gjetur 129.4 milionë lekë pagesa për shërbime të pakryera gjatë vitit 2025 në koncesionet e shëndetësisë
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.