Sport updated
Mbeumo Mbron Carrick: Mbështetje Absolute Trajnerit, Ka Shumë Zhgënjim Për Rastet E Shpërdoruara - Aktuale.mk
Reported by Aktuale.mk 209 points Why this story ranks here
What happened
Compiled from the sources
Edhe pse zhgënjimi është i madh, Bryan Mbeumo gjen disa aspekte pozitive në paraqitjen e Manchester United pas humbjes 2-0 ndaj Chelsea në Premier League.
In the story's original language
An excerpt from Aktuale.mk
Mbeumo mbron Carrick: Mbështetje absolute trajnerit, ka shumë zhgënjim për rastet e shpërdoruara Edhe pse zhgënjimi është i madh, Bryan Mbeumo gjen disa aspekte pozitive në paraqitjen e Manchester United pas humbjes 2-0 ndaj Chelsea në Premier League. Sulmuesi kamerunas beson se “Djajtë e Kuq” mund ta kishin ndryshuar rrjedhën e ndeshjes nëse do t’i kishin shfrytëzuar rastet e krijuara para pushimit. Mbeumo hodhi poshtë idenë se kjo paraqitje mund të nënkuptojë mungesë mbështetjeje nga lojtarët për Michael Carrick: “Sigurisht që jo! Mendoj se qëndrimi i duhur ishte i pranishëm që nga minuta e parë. Të luash me 10 lojtarë kundër 11 e bëri situatën më të vështirë. Kemi besim të plotë te të gjithë.” Lojtari kamerunas mbrojti përkushtimin e ekipit, pavarësisht një tjetër rezultati negativ: “Edhe pse mbetëm me dhjetë lojtarë, në fund të ndeshjes ndjemë sërish zhgënjim. Por besoj se si ekip dhamë maksimumin tonë. Ndoshta thjesht shpërdoruam disa raste. Mund të kishim kaluar në avantazh më…
What is still uncertain
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
- So far only Aktuale.mk reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.
How they headlined it
-
Aktuale.mk North Macedonia · publisher's date
Mbeumo Mbron Carrick: Mbështetje Absolute Trajnerit, Ka Shumë Zhgënjim Për Rastet E Shpërdoruara - Aktuale.mk
By Aktuale
Earliest report found by Mosaic
Edhe pse zhgënjimi është i madh, Bryan Mbeumo gjen disa aspekte pozitive në paraqitjen e Manchester United pas humbjes 2-0 ndaj Chelsea në Premier League.
Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language
How we decide
From Mosaic, not from a publisher
An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.
An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.
It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.
Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.
A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading
Follow developments
This story cannot be followed on its own. Follow its topics and category, and the new stories about them appear under Following.
Readers’ comments
These are readers’ own words, not the publishers’ and not Mosaic’s. Moderators read them; a comment that breaks the rules is hidden or removed.
No comments yet. Be the first to say something useful.