Publisher headlines and profiles remain in their original language. Choosing an edition does not translate them.

Society updated November 3, 2026 at 17:01

Cigaret elektronike dhe lënia e duhanit: Çfarë zbulon studimi Britanik?

Reported by Ekofin 215 points Why this story ranks here

What happened

Compiled from the sources

Një studim i ri i realizuar nga Queen Mary University of London ka zbuluar se cigaret elektronike mund t'i ndihmojnë duhanpirësit e rritur

In the story's original language

An excerpt from Ekofin

Një studim i ri i realizuar nga Queen Mary University of London ka zbuluar se cigaret elektronike mund t’i ndihmojnë duhanpirësit e rritur të lënë cigaret tradicionale edhe pa mbështetje të vazhdueshme psikologjike. Megjithatë, rezultatet tregojnë se kombinimi me këshillimin profesional rrit ndjeshëm mundësitë për sukses. Studimi, i financuar nga Instituti Kombëtar për Kërkimin Shëndetësor dhe Kujdesin në Mbretërinë e Bashkuar (NIHR) dhe i publikuar në revistën shkencore NEJM Evidence, përfshiu 1,170 të rritur dhe analizoi efektivitetin e metodave të ndryshme për lënien e duhanit. Sipas rezultateve, 11.3% e pjesëmarrësve që morën vetëm cigare elektronike arritën të qëndronin pa pirë cigare tradicionale për gjashtë muaj, krahasuar me 6.4% të atyre që morën vetëm mesazhe automatike mbështetëse nga shërbimi shëndetësor britanik NHS. Kjo do të thotë se pjesëmarrësit që përdorën cigare elektronike pa këshillim të specializuar kishin 76% më shumë gjasa të linin duhanin krahasuar me grupin…

What is still uncertain

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

So far only Ekofin reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.

How they headlined it

Reported by Ekofin. Each headline opens at its publisher, in a new tab.

Ekofin Albania · November 3, 2026 at 17:01 publisher's date

Cigaret elektronike dhe lënia e duhanit: Çfarë zbulon studimi Britanik?

By F Muca

Earliest report found by Mosaic

Një studim i ri i realizuar nga Queen Mary University of London ka zbuluar se cigaret elektronike mund t'i ndihmojnë duhanpirësit e rritur

Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language

How we decide

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.

An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.

It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.

A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.

Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.

Explore coverage Read at Ekofin

Reader rating: not enough eligible votes yet.

A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading