Society updated November 3, 2026 at 17:04

Çifti i ekzekutuar në Mekë jo për puthjen në xhami

By Pustina Patris

Reported by Faktoje.al How this story’s score was calculated

What happened

Compiled from the sources

In the story's original language

An excerpt from Faktoje.al

Pretendimi: Ky imazh tregon ekzekutimin e dy personave në Arabi Saudite, pas akuzave për keqbërje (një puthje në ballin e gruas së tij), akt të kryer brenda një xhamie në Mekë.Çifti i ekzekutuar në Mekë jo për puthjen në xhami Verdikti: E pavërtetë, Gjeneruar me AI ————————————————————— Një imazh që po qarkullon në rrjete sociale, përfshi ato shqipfolëse, pretendohet se tregon ekzekutimin e dy individëve të identifikuar si Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir dhe Siti Akhtar në Arabi Saudite. Postimet pretendojnë se ekzekutimi ndodhi pas akuzave për keqbërje brenda një xhamie në Mekë, pasi burri kishte puthur gruan e tij në ballë. Në një deklaratë të Ministrisë së Brendshme së Arabisë Saudite, të transmetuar nga Agjencia Saudite e Lajmeve më 14 tetor, thuhet se shtetasit bangladeshas Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir dhe Siti Akhtar u arrestuan, u akuzuan pas një hetimi dhe iu dërguan gjykatës. Gjykata i dënoi të dy me vdekje sipas parimit të *ta’zir*, një formë ndëshkimi që mbetet në diskrecionin e…

What is still uncertain

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

So far only Faktoje.al reports this story on Mosaic, so there is no other coverage to compare it with.

How they headlined it

Reported by Faktoje.al. Each headline opens at its publisher, in a new tab.

Faktoje.al Albania · November 3, 2026 at 17:04 publisher's date

Çifti i ekzekutuar në Mekë jo për puthjen në xhami

By Pustina Patris

Earliest report found by Mosaic

Pretendimi: Ky imazh tregon ekzekutimin e dy personave në Arabi Saudite, pas akuzave për keqbërje (një puthje në ballin e gruas së tij), akt të kryer brenda një xhamie në Mekë.Çifti i ekzekutuar në Mekë jo për puthjen në xhami Verdikti: E pavërtetë, Gjeneruar me AI ————————————————————— Një imazh…

Compiled from the outlet's own words · In the story's original language

How we decide

From Mosaic, not from a publisher

An article's time is the date its publisher gives, when that is plausible: not in the future, and not more than 180 minutes before Mosaic found the article. Otherwise it is when Mosaic first saw it. "Earliest report found by Mosaic" is the one with the earliest time; it does not prove that its outlet published first.

An article is marked "Repeats another outlet's text" when its cleaned text is word for word the same as another article's in the story, or nearly the same (the two texts' SimHash fingerprints differ in at most 12 of 64 bits). Both texts must have at least 30 words, and the articles must be within 48 hours of each other. That does not say who took it from whom: it can be a news agency's text or a press release that several outlets published.

It is also marked when at least 50 % of the two texts' three-word sequences are shared (estimated with MinHash), as with a copy whose lead, footer or page elements differ.

A story leads with the eligible report with the highest current score, when every eligible report has one. Otherwise it leads with the earliest report found by Mosaic, which says nothing about its quality. Reports repeating another outlet's text and paid or organisation-issued articles are left out of the comparison.

Think one of these labels is wrong? Use "Contest this" beside it: staff look at every one.

Explore coverage Read at Faktoje.al

Reader rating: not enough eligible votes yet.

A vote says whether a story deserves more or less prominence; it does not say whether it is true. If a story is false or misleading, report it instead. For now votes are collected and do not change the order of stories. How votes are used · Report it as false or misleading